Case 2

Running Head : FactsBy the terms of an spontaneous sire amongst Gabriella ( plaintiff ) and Bob (Defendant , the complainant hold to purchase the defendant s second-hand iPod for the conglomeration of 100 . They further agreed to seal impinge on the credit by Friday of that week out front noonday , by which the complainant was to submit the agreed sum at Starbucks . The defendant was in critical need of the cash hence they particular(prenominal)ally outlined the terms that if the complainant failed to remit the sum by noon , the wrap up was off . Unfortunately , the complainant s car was conglomerate in a minor accident on her counsel from purchase this specific iPod s accessories from a friend fashioning her to be belated . The defendant waited until 12 .45 br.m and the complainant having not shown up , riffle the iPod at 12 .50 to a friend for 80Legal IssueFrom the facts presented above , the wakeless issue is the non procedure of an orally established engenderLawsConsidering the uniqueness of the repugn item , specific transaction as delimit infra common law , is an impound remedy for this dilemma . unique(predicate) performance is a law that demands that the defendant be ed by court to perform the contract as agreed upon Smits , Haas Hesen (2008ApplicationThe law of specific performance is the most appropriate for analyzing this fray . The iPod in question was unique and the complainant had already bought special(prenominal) accessories suited for the equipment Furthermore , an oral contract is binding and prize in a trial court In Severson v . Elveron Elevator , Inc (1977 , FindLaw (2008 ) the plaintiff s petition for specific performance was upheld by the Iowa Supreme Court , even though the contract was oral . Furthermore , in this case , the defendant sold off the equipment to someone else even aft(pre! nominal) agreeing to sell it to the complainant , and owe to the technicalities surrounding the agreement , monetary compensation whitethorn gain an inadequate remedy for this situation .

But is the complainant justify to seek specific performanceNotably , the defendant critically required the money before noon this was a major favor before agreeing to the contract . He honored his end of the contract by waiting for the complainant for an additional 45 proceeding after the stipulated item to a friend hence the thought of find it may cause him severe hardships , hence , specific performance is therefore difficul t almost impossible . technically , although not exactly her fault , it was the complainant who failed to arrive at the stipulate snip , besides the oral contract , apart from the time , did not define other miscellaneous essentials of the deal such(prenominal) as measures to be undertaken in case whatsoever of the parties contravened any(prenominal) part of the contractThe complainant further has no ground in the case since , the time of the contract was well defined making the contract terminable at will aver she failed to musical accompaniment it . Any claim that she has brought accessories specific to the ipod is invalid since , she did so at will without informing the...If you want to get a panoptic essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper