Critical Thinking Evaluation

Critial Evaluation of an Academic Source NMN genus Gallinago University ED5001 Critial Evaluation of an Academic Source This paper is a over little paygrade regarding the suitability of use scholarly terminals as an faculty member source. We will tumble the Critical Thinking An Extended Definition that discusses different scholar definiitons on what is exact thought process and the process of precise mentation. Checklist for Critical Evaluation mates Re formulation at Is the phrase peer re projected? This expression is a peer review. Is the name primary, secondary, or tertiary?This article is tertiary. Main Issue What is the main geld or problem the beginning is focusing on in this article? The main coming back that the reference is focusing on is the judgement that in the academician world the word critical thinking is go ford frequently, plainly the way it is defined is so broad that at times it is big(a) to apply these definitions. It seems that variou s scholars have a different definition for critical thinking, and in more or less cases the definitions are lacking in terms of liberal direction on the process of thinking critically. Significance of the IssueDiscuss the significance of the relinquish which is the focus of the article. The significance of the issue in this article is the author is toilsome to tell those in the academic world that the idea of critical thinking is so broad that those in the various disciplines need to see on that point needs to be sustained discussion regarding the idea of critical thinking. This idea that theres no one answer with reagrds to defining critical thinking. Why is it important? I think its important becaexercising according to the article that the different disciplines have a different way of looking at critical thinking.This main reason is wherefore the author feels that everyone should discuss this idea of critical thinking on a continuos basis. Having discussions on a continuou s basis allows scholars from various disciplines to look at varying perspectives of critical thinking that they wouldnt otherwise see in their own discipline. On what do you base your assertions regarding its significance? I base my assertions from the different definitions of critical thinking from various scholars from different backgrounds that the author discussed. germs PurposeWhat is the authors main purpose(s) in writing the article? The main purpose of the author writing this article is to promote the discussion between scholars of different academic disciplines regarding the definition of critical thinking and the ways it can be applied. Authors Point of View What is the authors point of view? The authors point of view is that critical thinking has a broad a definition and can be applied in different ways depending on how the person is looking at it. conceptual Foundation What are the main concepts presented in the article?The main concepts presented in this article first the idea that theres no suck in and precise definition of critical thinking. The second main concept that I found in the article is the idea of knowing and asking note questions. The other concept that I got from the article is the idea that the term critical thinking has different meaning in various contexts. What culture is the author using, and what is its relationship to the main issue? The information that the author is using is to look at various scholars from different disciplines definition and application of the term critical thinking.Does the information used appear relevant, significant, valid, and sufficient for the conclusions existence drawn? Yes I remember it is relevant, significant, and sufficient enough to be used to draw a conclusion. Do you have enough information to determine whether the information is relevant, significant, and valid? Yes I do, because the author has provided us with how different disciplines define and use the term critical thinking. The author is able to show us how broad and unclear the term critical thinking is. Authors Assumptions What unstated assumptions is the author making in the article?The unstated assumptions that the other is making the article is the idea that all academic disciplines use critical thinking as a basis in their field of study. Another assumption that I think is being do is that scholars in various disciplines forefathert agree across the gore with regards to defining critical thinking and its application. Authors Conclusions What conclusion(s) are being drawn by the author? The author I think is last(a) that this article will help speakers, scholars, listeners etc. to not only find the term critical thinking better, but also help them to use the term in academic literature.What are the implications of the conclusion(s)? The implication of the conclusion is the event that the author is making the assumption that a lot of people dont understand and/or know how to use the term in gener al especially in academic literature. Problem Areas What potential problems do you see in the authors reasoning? I thinking that the author great power be a little bias in making the assumptuion that only if because the term critical thinking definition is so broad that most scholars dont discuss with each other in ordinate to understand the context that theyre using the term.What potential problems are there with the authors use of information? The author doesnt really show how he laid the various scholar definitions he chose to use in making his various points. You dont know if his selections were subjective or objective. What point of view is ignored by this author, or has not been considered in dealing with the issue? Summary of Critical Evaluation Would you use the article in body forth of your own writing? I dont think I would use this article in my own writing. Why or why not?The reason I wouldnt use this article because it seems to be a one-sided argument, and the autho r seems to make a lot of assumptions slightly what goes on in the academic world in terms of using the word critical thinking. What limitations would you put on its use? The limitations I would place is that the author may have placed too much of his judgment in the article. References Capella University. (n. d. ). Critical thinking model. Retrieved from http//media. capella. edu/CourseMedia/PSYC4900/criticalThinking/criticalThinking_wrapper. asp