'Mariano Azuela’s novel “Los de Abajo” Essay\r'

'Mariano Azuela’s bracing â€Å"Los de Abajo”, human activityd â€Å"The Underdogs” by Enrique Munguía Jr., in his English translation, has been hailed as the impudent of the Mexican vicissitude. In this bracing Azuela creates characters representative of the two factions that ar at variance, the revolutionaries and the federalists. The fabrication is divided into leash spots and each part subdivided into chapters, the first part being the longest and the 3rd being the shortest. Enrique Munguía’s translation is close to 140 pages in length and many eat noned that this allegory is one of Azuela’s shortest.\r\nThe smart is, however, quite entertaining and it maintains the referees’ attention throughout. For anyone interested in a serious study of Mexican history, this is an necessity novel to read as it gives a perspective into the social aspects of the revolution that few text give-and-takes can capture. The book has h istorical significance because it gives a description of the Mexican revolution from the perspective of people who were directly touch by and have-to doe with in the ultra process.\r\nliterally the title of the novel in Spanish â€Å"Los de Abajo” translates to cerebrate those from or at the bottom. This I believe is a very appropriate title and in itself captures Azuela’s primary object that he maintains throughout the novel. The revolutionaries and the federalists are constantly juxtaposed against each other in the novel but Azuela, through the eyes of Luis Cervantes, allows the reader to see that the two groups are not that dissimilar.\r\n two factions display distrust, treachery, moral decadence and kill so mercilessly that it is no wonder that the words of the title â€Å"Los de Abajo” is used in the novel to refer to twain the rebels and the federalists. Early in Part I chapter three when Demetrio led his men into the first ambush of the political sc ience processs he instructs his men to â€Å"Get those coming up from under! Los de Abajo! Get the underdogs!” be screamed. ulterior on in chapter 6 the narrator reflects of Luis Cervantes, on the first night of his joining the revolutionaries, that â€Å"Did not the sufferings of the underdogs, of the deprive masses, move him to the core?… the subjugated, the beaten and baffled.”\r\nThe horizontalts in the novel mirror the Mexican revolution of 1910. The main speckle of the story is that of a peasant farmer, Demetrio Macias who, after having suffered at the hands of the federalists, decides to join Pancho Villa’s revolutionary army.\r\nA defector of the government army, Luis Cervantes †elite and educated, joins Demetrio’s troop because of his support of the ideals he believed the revolutionaries espoused. Azuela, however, uses this character as his mouth and, in his disillusionment that the revolutionaries were not fighting found on ide ologies; the reader gets an understanding of Azuela’s perspective. He, akin Cervantes, abandoned the agitate and migrated to the United States after having make uped along with Pancho Villa as a military doctor accept his ideals to have been betrayed.\r\nOne of the main lessons that Azuela delivers here is pertinent in so many areas of life. His major argument in presenting his novel is that without purpose, focus, planning and proper management, even the most worth eyepatch efforts depart prove to be futile.\r\nThe most positive aspect of Azuela’s novel is that it was compose while the struggles in the revolution were calm going on. Beginning in 1914 the novel began to be published as a series in a Texas newspaper in installments though it was not until 1925 that it began to gain worldwide attention.\r\nThis novel details the battles in the Mexican revolution from the perspective of the author who himself was a witness of these very events. Prior to moving to Texas, Azuela support the revolutionary movement by offering his checkup services to Pancho Villa’s army. In such a position he was exposed to the ills of the revolutionary battle, much so from the perspective of the revolutionaries. Azuela was consequently in a fitting position to discuss the Mexican revolution because he too had been very intimately involved in the process.\r\nHowever, while this novel bears relevance to the themes that were confront the Mexicans at the time when they were most involved in the revolution, it fails to give a complete picture of the revolutionary process. The problem with the novel is precisely because it was written so close to the actual events. This prevents the reader from having a append picture of the ‘before’, the ‘during’ and the ‘after’ of the revolution.\r\nIn the uniform way that Demetrio’s eyes remain ‘leveled in an eternal glance’ at the end of the novel, so does th e battle between the revolutionaries and the federalists give the impression that it will last eternally without resolution or success for either side. The tone of Azuela’s novel therefore comes off as being very pessimistic. bankruptcy and doom is the only outcome of the revolutionary struggle and no one seems to be winning. Azuela’s destruction here seems to be rather generalized.\r\nAuthors who have written about the revolution subsequent to Azuela have had the welfare of seeing the long-term results of the struggle which revealed much to a greater extent positive effects than what were immediately obvious while the struggles were still going on.\r\nREFERENCES\r\nAzuela, Mariano (1963). The Underdogs (Enrique Munguía Jr. Trans.). The U.S.A.: Penguin Group. (Original work published 1916).\r\n'